Friday, September 12, 2008

Ploof v. Putnam (a.k.a. Protecting Ploof's sloop)

Ploof v. Putnam
81 Vt. 471, 71 A. 188 (1908).

Facts:
  • Def. owned island in Lake Champlain
  • Plain. w/ wife and 2 kids, were sailing a sloop on the lake when storm hit
  • Plain. moored boat on def.'s dock to avoid destruction of boat and protect family from injury
  • Def. had servant unmoor boat
  • Sloop was destroyed and people on board were injured
  • Plain. argued act of unmooring boat was a trespass to it and that def. had duty to permit sloop to remain attached to dock

Issue:
Does unmooring a boat from a dock, which is moored there to protect boat and avoid injury to members on board boat during a storm, constitute a trespass?

Holding: Yes, value life over property.

Reasoning:
  • "There are many cases...which hold that necessity...will justify entries upon land and interferences with personal property that would otherwise have been trespasses..."
  • Entry upon land to save goods in danger of being lost/destryd by water/fire is not a trespass
Judgment: Held for plaintiff

Opinions: N/A

Thoughts: privilege of private necessity

No comments: